Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Urban Campaign


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

World Urban Campaign

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of significance and third party reference links Itsalleasy (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 19:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, "No indication of significance" is CSD criteria, but does not apply since the article makes numerous claims of significance. The question here is one of notability, and the nominator apparently failed WP:BEFORE because I found third-party coverage of the program at the American Planning Association, the Cities Alliance, the NGO Practical Action, the Deutcher Bundesstag (i.e., the German Parliament), the International Union of Architects, and more.  Easily passes WP:GNG. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * not all of these sources are third party. some of these are partners of the World Urban Campaign, such as the Bundestag, Practical action, and cities alliance. LibStar (talk) 01:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. coverage tends to be in the planning professional community so not entirely third party. what would get it over the line is coverage in mainstream press. LibStar (talk) 01:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete In addition to problems with notability, there is no content worth saving. &#39;DGG (at NYPL)&#39; (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.