Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Vegetable Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

World Vegetable Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seriously promotional article written by two accounts affiliated with the organization that needs a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopedic. Even the refs are questionable at this point. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  00:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Completely unsourced material. About a half-dozen external links, but not citations. Mtiffany71 (talk) 00:50, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Citations and sources provided. Recommendation changed to 'keep.' Mtiffany71 (talk) 16:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong keep Plenty of citations, now...Res Mar 03:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep References have been added, though they weren't that hard to find at all. Just click the Google News or Google Books links at the top. Bam. Presto. Silver  seren C 04:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It is the responsibility of the person adding information to WP to provide sources and citations at the time they are adding it, no one else's. Mtiffany71 (talk) 17:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * While that may be true, it is also the responsibility of the nominator of an AfD to make an attempt at finding proper sourcing for an article, per WP:BEFORE #9. Silver  seren C 17:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.