Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku Raiden Championships 12


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 22:33, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku Raiden Championships 12

 * – ( View AfD View log )

also nominating: another useless of sporting results with no third party coverage. fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku Raiden Championships 13
 * World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku Raiden Championships 14
 * World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku Raiden Championships 15
 * World Victory Road Presents: Soul of Fight
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 4 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Sengoku was one of the best organizations in the world, akin to Strikeforce or DREAM. These events feature notable fighters and world title fights. - Minowafan (talk) 15:26, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all I agree Sengoku is notable, but these events are just routine sports coverage. Astudent0 (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all - routine sports coverage what we keep getting spammed with. Neutralitytalk 03:57, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Articles are referenced by one or possibly two routine notices each, plus one or two primary or WP links. Web search indicates there's a bit more routine coverage out there, but nothing to indicate the substantial coverage from WP:RS sources required to satisfy WP:GNG. If anyone can find substantial WP:RS coverage, happy to have another look. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 04:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of notability
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.