Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Vision in Progress


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

World Vision in Progress

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page contains a small amount of useful information that could easily be merged with Rimsha Masih blasphemy case. Andrew (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find sources that would establish notability for this per WP:ORG so my recommendation would be to delete and merge that single paragraph into the blasphemy case article. § FreeRangeFrog croak
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 03:02, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Merge somewhere and redirect - Google News found results for another organization with the same name and Christian affiliaton, World Vision, this confirms they are not related, unsurprisingly (this is a rather short and common name for an organization). However, I did find some relevant results for World Vision in Progress here and here (both Italian) and a different search provided additional links relevant to the Rimsha Masih case here and other results here and here (both Pakistan Christian Post). Considering they are based in Lahore, I searched and found this news article from Lahore which mentions a "World Vision" but I don't know if this is relevant. It seems they also gained attention for helping a man, Amanat Masih, who is the father of the girl in the first Pakistan Christian Post article, also accused of blasphemy, with news articles here, here and others. So far, I don't think I have found any evidence when this group was founded or its founder, although I have found an executive director and spokesman but I would assume the foundation is recent (ten years or less). A slightly better article could be written with these cases above but it wouldn't be sufficient. SwisterTwister   talk  06:09, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 06:19, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Redirect Hardly any content. LK (talk) 06:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, no evidence of notability, hardly even any mergeable content. Hairhorn (talk) 02:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.