Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World War 2: Time of Wrath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  20:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

World War 2: Time of Wrath

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Neither of these video games pass WP:N; moreover, Wikipedia is not a game guide. I am also nominating the following related page for similar reasons:
 * A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 20:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete doing google searches, it shows up at all of the standard gaming websites, but there's very little reviews about the game, just the standard "press release" style synopses of the game which I could get from the game box or company website. Many sites I check don't even have any user reviews, a red flag which indicates that the game has not made a significant impact and is likely not notable.  -- Jayron  32  20:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Weak delete for both - Amidst the press releases at IGN etc, I found a review linked at n4g; the source is a site called Gamedot. I don't know if they are reliable, and the link is broken. Also This report by one of the beta testers is a primary source but might make for good supporting material. For Storm over the Pacific I found another link at n4g; the source is TheGamersHub, again a site who's reliability I'm not certain of. Of course, if the developer's article survives its AfD, these can be redirected there. Marasmusine (talk) 10:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.