Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World White Web


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

World White Web
Dicdef. POV and cannot be made NPOV. Will never be anything more than a dicdef. Delete KleenupKrew 22:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

What is Dicdef? In any case, I agree. Delete. The article was never any good even when it was arguably true. TastyCakes 23:10, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * dicdef = dictionary definition KleenupKrew 23:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as inherently POV and unencyclopedic. M1ss1ontomars2k4 23:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a neologism and suffers from incurable POV issues. Reyk  YO!  00:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per all of the above. Zaxem 00:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - incurably POV neologism. Grand  master  ka  04:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: dicdef, POVness and neologismity are icing on the cake. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.