Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World at War (Game Tournament)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

World at War (Game Tournament)

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:WEB, asserts no claim to notability and has no reliable sources. BJ Talk 13:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No non-primary sources found. Wickethewok 16:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - I've heard of this tournament myself, but only as part of my previous experience playing Battlefield 1942. By itself, it is not a notable subject, failing WP:WEB, as well as having no credible sources. It's not informative to readers outside of the BF1942/Forgotten Hope. --Scottie theNerd 20:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:WEB, WP:V, WP:RS. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Plus the creators have made this article Goatopia that has been backlogged at CSD for some time (hint to closing admin: speedy Goatopia at the same time). &rArr;    SWAT Jester    On Belay!  07:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is one of the most notable/best-known Battlefield-tournaments, and with Battlefield being one of the most popular multiplayer games, this article is certainly notable. Admittable, it could need some expanding/referecing. Ewok 20:17, 16 January 2007 (GMT+1)
 * You can't just say keep because its notable. Why is it notable?  What about the complete lack of sources at the moment?  Wickethewok 05:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep I am part of the World at War and I am a source and so is the owners of the World at war. it is NOT OUR FALUT there is no sources. NO one will give us the press, we need [22ndCW]Dell970 16:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a press venue, it's an encyclopedia.  Sure, the standards are lenient, but there's still no verifiable indication that this tournament is notable.  --Alan Au 20:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I HAVE A IDEA. WHY DONT YOU JOIN THE WORLD AT WAR TOURNY THEN YOU CANT SAY THAT THIS IS ALL NOT TRUE. [22ndCW]Dell970 22:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, I'm a fickler for wanting reliable, independant third-party sources for web content, both for the "WEB" guideline and official policy regarding verifiability of information. I'm not convinced that the current version meets these standards. Daniel.Bryant 11:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.