Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World in Conflict honours system


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was transwiki and delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

World in Conflict honours system

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Wikipedia is not a game guide. Lists of achievements are considered unsuitable. Contested prod. -- pb30 < talk > 22:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom., which says it all. JohnCD (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Maralia (talk) 23:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete exactly per nom. -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  00:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 18:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. If there is anything that is specifically notable about the honors system for this game, I would put it in the game article. Can't see how there would be enough info besides the gameguide info to be on its own. Slavlin (talk) 01:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I created a new page because the World in Conflict page itself has already been labelled as too long. I can see how this article can be interpreted as a game-guide, but that was not my intention. I wanted to add the details of the medals in the game as it is an important part of multiplayer mode. Mjb1981 (talk) 01:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment That could be a reasonable way to go, but a better focus for the information would be why the medals matter and what has been said about that. I don't see that could leave enough for a separate article though. Slavlin (talk) 01:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. Gromlakh (talk) 03:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to |strategy wiki and delete Despite the very best of intentions and being well presented, this is the kind of material which is better suited to GameFAQs, for instance this Warhawk statistics guide covers exactly the same kind of material. Once you've gone past the point of summarizing gameplay, press reception etc. you've gone too far into 'by players for players' territory. Players who want this kind of information can find it on the sites like GameFAQs which specialize in it. Someoneanother 17:55, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.