Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World of Warcraft Emulation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash talk 01:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

World of Warcraft Emulation
Original research. Non-notable fancruft. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:51, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: While an article about this subject might be useful - the current article is nothing more than poorly written original research. All four external links in the article are broken. --Hetar 00:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 00:18, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research. Jedi6 00:20, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as very narrative-style original research, would require a rewrite if we were to have an article on this anyway. -- Mithent 00:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete very poorly written and original research. btw we might want to consider what should happen if it returns in a better style, as it's about something not allowed by blizzard. Boneyard 14:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. --TheKoG 15:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Wikibooks, compelling reading, but wholly unencyclopedic. Ewlyahoocom 18:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: My bad. I'll recreate with more encyclopedic wording. Zite 07:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: It's a good article, it needs improving but it's a start &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by XSpaceyx (talk &bull; contribs).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.