Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldline (company) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability is as weakly supported as in the version that was deleted per AfD in August 2016. Bishonen &#124; talk 21:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Worldline (company)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable business; previously created under similar names by same editor, with a strong presumption of COI based on the username. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  00:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is an unlinked article on the German Wikipedia but it is also poorly supported, with only one reference to a primary-source announcement. I am not seeing better than routine announcements, and nothing to suggest encyclopaedic notability and negate the August 2016 AfD decision. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: It is an informational page and matches it's counterpart on the FR version. Worldline's parent company Atos has many references throughout Wikipedia that are incorrect, as they should now be referencing Worldline.  If Wikipedia is about providing reliable information, then this page should to be included.  What makes this page debatable for deletion when it provides much the same content as many other company pages on Wikipedia. GhWL (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * reply - that argument is abbreviated WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, and is not a valid argument for retention of this article, but rather an argument for the deletion of the other pages you refer to. By the way: what is your relationship to Worldline, GhWL? -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  22:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.