Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Worldwide Records

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This appears to be a non-notable record label with no significant coverage in reliable sources, as required by WP:CORPDEPTH. Most of the currently cited sources aren't reliable, and those that are reliable only provide passing mention or provide routine coverage. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 14:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article was created and mostly edited by now-blocked socks of Alizulfikarzahedi, along with a few anonymous users who could potentially be the same individuals evading blocks. I haven't observed any substantial edits by others, so this could be eligible for deletion under WP:G5. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 14:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, India,  and Bihar. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 14:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Appears to be spam. Too much press release and unreliable sources used as source.  @T.C.G.  &lbrack;talk&rbrack;  17:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mostly unreliable sources, sources with link errors and somewhat reliable source there is like BBC, it has no depth coverage about the company or its background. It is more about who the company signed or dealt with. Per nom, the page is also eligible for deletion per WP:G5. RangersRus (talk) 13:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.