Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide wave of action (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). A merge discussion can continue on a talk page if desired. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 01:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Worldwide wave of action
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Three months after the previous review of this article, which led to no conclusion, I decided to see what had ever become of this event now that it was supposed to have ended. Despite its being billed as a "worldwide wave", there is no reporting of substance on this alleged three-month-long string of protests. There are 132 Google hits for, mostly from before the alleged start date. If it wasn't a hoax or rumor, then it was simply a plan that didn't bear fruit. No notability. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment As for the sources cited in the article, I guess they weren't reliable sources, ipso facto. This really leaves us with no appropriate sources for information from which a coherent article could be built. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 12.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 18:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect - The thing clearly didn't pan out. I think that there are enough RSs and enough material that this should probably be a small section in some article, likely Anonymous, but Largoplazo is right, this doesn't need to be an article. Juno (talk) 08:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete or Merge/Redirect as per nominator and . No evidence in sources that I could find, internationally or nationally, for worldwide wave of action.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:31, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.