Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwidewives


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Worldwidewives
Largely serves to advertise porn sites Anthony Appleyard 16:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, maybe speedy - Based on the number of external porn links embedded in the article, this baby might qualify for speedy for advertising. Even assuming good faith, the site's Alexa rating of 17,483 isn't particularly notable.  Even putting aside both of these issues, the article is highly speculative and poorly cited. That's at least three strikes.  - b o b b y  16:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam -- Whpq 17:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom and comments above. Chris Kreider 18:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as {db-spam} . The Dogging (sexual slang) article got spammed with a link to this article, after the external link got reverted.  OscarTheCat3 22:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Guess i've really upset a few people by posting this article. It wasnt done with any hidden agenda, other than to allow WorldWideWives an entry into it. I see manny other companies / websites of a similar genre and with hindsight would have probably paid more attention to resources available on wikipedia in repsect of guidelines etc. Any assistance or help in making this article more in line with guidelines etc will be gratefully received. 1 November 2006 User:Www therev
 * Speedy Delete as the site that this article discusses is neither remarkable, notable or particularly unusual. It just doesn't merit it's own article.  It's only purpose is advertisement. Inkwell 18:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.