Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwithoutwalls

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 21:38, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

Worldwithoutwalls
Besides the problematic title, this appears to be original research: From article, "by Ruchira Bajaj", one of two contribs from User:Ruchirabajaj. Niteowlneils 06:01, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV original research. Megan1967 06:53, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete what Megan1967 said. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 15:02, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, essay, original research. Wyss 19:41, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A couple of lines are coming through as semi-copyvios.  It's plagiarized. - Lucky 6.9 23:43, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. All of the above are good reasons. Carrp | Talk 03:50, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, looks copyvio. Author also blanked, making it look as if it deserves deletion. --Bart133 (t) 04:43, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm going to try to turn it into a better article right now... Beta_M talk, |contrib ( &Euml;-Mail )
 * OK, this article was shit, after starting to edit i realised that i could use 1 (one) sentence out of it... i still keep my vote, but if you wish to delete it, go for it. Beta_M talk, |contrib ( &Euml;-Mail )

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.