Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete as vandalism. Should be "thorrow" anyway. Stifle (talk) 12:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Worrow

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Completely fails WP:NEO, and may be made up. Is this speediable? TallNapoleon (talk) 03:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-referenced. Would not pass dictionary approval and meets no wiki criteria --Daviddavey (talk) 04:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:DICDEF. Agree that this would not pass Wiktionary muster. MuZemike  ( talk ) 06:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's obviously WP:BOLLOCKS and something made up one day; additionally, I'd suggest it could be speedied because it exists primarily to mock a particular kind of lisp. AlexTiefling (talk) 10:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.