Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worser

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedy delete. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 00:36, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * 07:44, Mar 22, 2005 Postdlf deleted Worser (content was: 'Worser offically isn't really a word. -Used as a synonym for worse - it can be used to describe that something is getting more worse at a bigger rate, related to [worseleration].')

worser
As the article helpfully tells us in its opening sentence, this isn't a word. Even if it were a word, an article for it such as this would belong in the dictionary, not in the encyclopaedia. Uncle G 13:22, 2005 Mar 21 (UTC)
 * Can't we speedy this as nonsense? Delete. Mgm|(talk) 13:40, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or speedy Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 15:30, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, and while you're at it add an article for bester, bestest, and worsest. Speedy. Wow. Someone has too much free time. Pufferfish101 17:11, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. not a word. This article is worser than I though it would be. DaveTheRed 18:09, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Deleting this will make Wikipedia more gooder. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 19:04, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Speedy under general case 1. Chris 20:52, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.