Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worship Leader (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Worship Leader (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Since the only references in the article are primary and I could find no in-depth secondary sources in a WP:BEFORE, this fails both GNG and NCORP notability standards. Adamant1 (talk) 04:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment -- The problem with this article is that its only source is related to the publisher. The question however is whether this is a notable publication.  If it is, we ought to have an article on it, even if we only have sources connected with it.  The issue here is in a sense the reverse of the BLP issue.  There is no libel worry over using the connected source.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:09, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment A topic may be significant for some reason, but if RIS can’t be found for it then by our definition it’s not notable. Mccapra (talk) 03:58, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.