Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worship Leader (magazine) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Worship Leader (magazine)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I nominated this for deletion back in 2020 because it lacked notability. Unfortunately no one voted in the AfD and it closed as no consensus. So I'm re-nominating it now since from what I can tell nothing has changed about it since then. To summarize, what this comes down to for me is that the article has only been referenced to a single primary source since 2013 and I can't find anything about it anywhere that would work for notability. Nor could I when I originally nominated it. Especially if this is considered an article about a company and therefore has to pass WP:NCORP. Which I think it is and should. I'm not super up on what reputable, in-depth resources exist for articles related to Christian subjects or magazines though. So maybe someone can find sources I missed. If any are found, they should follow the notability guidelines from the gate and not be trivial, primary, or anything else that the guidelines say shouldn't be used for determining notability. Adamant1 (talk) 01:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I am aware of the magazine and have been since shortly after its inception, but it is a niche publication, catering to those interested in leading contemporary worship music. It is not a corporation but a publication, but either way, it fails notability criteria for either NCORP and Wikipedia:Notability (periodicals) and certainly WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: It is clearly an established, low importance culture and worship publication. There are a few self-generated publicity stunts in low-tier sources (e.g., distributing awards ), but no SIGCOV from reliable sources that demonstrates it warrants its own page in the articlespace at this time. Multi7001 (talk) 03:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.