Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worth Your While


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Unsourced, unverifiable, WP:CRYSTAL. Kafziel Talk 22:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Worth Your While

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Completely unreferenced and contains numerous unsourced claims. As far as I am able to discern using Google, only the title has been confirmed at this point. If the article were to be trimmed back to include only what is verifiable, it would only consist of a single sentence. A single line in the Sterling Simms article would serve the same purpose. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, no WP:SOURCES, not verifiable (article admits this with the heading leaked songs), rampant crystal ballery. Mr Senseless (talk) 23:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This type of articles should be deleted from Wikipedia. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:19, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.Kww (talk) 03:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.