Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worthington-New Haven State Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 19:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Worthington-New Haven State Road

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is no indication that this road even comes close to meeting our minimum requirements for notability. The only source is a random blog entry that has not been updated since 2003. I could not find anything else. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 16:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. &#8213; Susmuffin  Talk 16:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. &#8213; Susmuffin  Talk 16:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. &#8213; Susmuffin  Talk 16:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete—unless someone can find any more sources, this fails WP:GNG.  Imzadi 1979  →   16:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references. The seemingly self-published reference appears to be derived from an article, complete with map, in Columbus Dispatch's Sunday Magazine in 1968 (not available only, except for the article reproduced on roadfan.com). I added that 1968 article, as well as reference to the road in 1820 legislation and a 1917 book, History of transportation in the United States before 1860. Besides, we have lots of articles on other notable roads. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, per the improvements made by Eastmain -- what I am seeing now appears to pass GNG. jp×g 09:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Improved significantly since nomination. NemesisAT (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep since article is much better now, after multiple improvements.-- Melaleuca alternifolia  |  talk  20:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.