Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WotWentWrong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

WotWentWrong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Service no longer exists. As well, page seems inherently promotional and of little value to an encyclopedia. Does not appear to have been a major service. Coldzonecrazy (talk) 05:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm neutral about notability, but I think I should alert the nominator that notability is not temporary. Also, I find it rather peculiar that an editor's very first contribution is an AfD nomination.  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 05:40, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Changing my !vote to keep; although the article can stand a rewrite, I can still identify enough significant coverage. I also noticed that the original creator was never notified of this discussion, so I did just that.  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 08:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Sufficient secondary sources and depth of coverage to prove notability. --Drm310 (talk) 06:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Meets WP:WEBCRIT. Source examples include: ABC News, Huffington Post, Reuters. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.