Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Would You Believe? (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Would You Believe? (song)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No content, sources, or notability for an article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. No awards, no chart, no covers, no WP:RS.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 02:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Roxy Music (album). Anyone who is aware of Wikipedia's WP:DAB or WP:MUSTARD guidelines may use this is a search term. --JD554 (talk) 09:51, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:48, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a charting single, or has several reliable sources about the song. The notability is not there. Tavix | Talk  02:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete non-plausible search term, no notability. If "Would You Believe?" is being search for as a Roxy Music then a properly linked Would You Believe? dab page is enough. Duffbeerforme (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * As I stated above, anybody aware of Wikipedia's guidelines may use it to find an article. No harm is caused by having a redirect. --JD554 (talk) 13:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable song. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 14:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC))
 * Redirect. A lack of notability for a separate article, is insufficient reason to ignore the possibility to redirect the name or merge information in favor of deletion. Nominator shows no evidence of having done the research required by WP:BEFORE. JD554 explained why the title is perfectly plausible. - Mgm|(talk) 10:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.