Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wovle

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 01:48 (UTC)

Wovle
Marketing for Woolworths in Australia. A very odd article, perhaps it is an in-company review page? I couldn't find a copyvio, though it does feel like one. smoddy 12:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if this is advertising or not, but there already exists an article for Woolworths Limited, so this one is really redundant. I dunno if "Wovle" is a slang term for Woolworths or something. If it is, a simple redirect should do the trick (I don't think there's any information in the article that needs preserving). If not, delete. -- Captain Disdain 12:12, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * A quick delete is more aproporate. --Cool Cat My Talk 12:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * None of those are criteria for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag.  smoddy 12:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * If you say so. Woolworths Limited does exist. Article is about Woolworths Limited. Faster it gets deleted the better IMHO. Anyways... --Cool Cat My Talk 12:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Due process, my friend, due process. Let's not be accused of cabalism.  smoddy 12:36, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Exterminate! as soon as possible. --Cool Cat My Talk 12:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * del I have no idea what a wovle is and this article doesn't contain that string. --MarSch 16:55, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I'm Australian, the word "wovle" isn't used at all, reads like an advertising screed.
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.