Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wowhead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 04:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Wowhead

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to fail WP:WEB. Doesn't have any references to notability and has little information in the article. SimonRK 12:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This World of Warcraft database has thousands, if not tens of thousands of users. There are hundreds of unique Google hits that assert that it is well known, especially within the MMORPG community.  Famous? Debatable, as all game-related sites are... but Notable? Certainly. That all being said, the article needs citations like so many of the articles in Wikipedia.  Lets keep this one and find someone to improve it. Scienter 17:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The website must be notable inits own right, not be notable because of any association with the afrementioned online game. If the importance of the website can be justfied through the use of print, magazine, or news articles as sources... they you may have a case for keeping. -- saberwyn 21:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. WoW database websites are a dime a dozen; no reliable sources to confirm notability. — Krimpet (talk/review) 00:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, not sourced. At the very MOST, it should be listed as a fansite for Warcraft. --Wirbelwind ヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 06:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Artaxiad 21:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.