Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrascally wabbit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as an obvious attack article. This is, quite clearly, someone writing about someone that xe knows, under a nickname, abusing Wikipedia to have a go at that person. It's not an encyclopaedia article, and it's not a good faith attempt to even start one. Uncle G (talk) 04:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Wrascally wabbit

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no evidence whatsoever that this expression is in any kind of widespread use--and even if it were, it wouldn't be an encyclopedic topic. Article was prodded before and prod removed; I'm taking it to AfD. Drmies (talk) 02:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic entry. Not even capable of dictionary entry. Bongo  matic  02:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Dewete While Elmer Fudd in numewous cawtoons bewated a "Wascally Wabbit," due to his swight speech impediment, he never once wefewed to a "Wrascally Wabbit," and I have studied aw Fudd cawtoons. Faiws vewifiabiwity and notabiwity. Edison (talk) 02:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The phrase "wascally wabbit" might warrant a redirect, but "wrascally [sic] wabbit" does not. --darolew (talk) 03:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Did you mean "Wediwect?" Edison (talk) 03:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.