Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WrestleSlam Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

WrestleSlam Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No suggestion of notability. Unable to find any independent coverage. The so-called "NASDAQ" company has no listing or any coverage, and doesn't register on any finance sites (including Bloomberg), not that being so listed would, by itself, be an indication of notability. Bongo  matic  01:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 07:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

MDH326 (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2011 (UTC) — MDH326 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep Slam Content and redirect WrestleSlam Magazine to it. The Slam Content article has sources, however the company is not listed on Bloomberg because an IPO has not been offered.  Hence, the inactive next to the NASDAQ indicator.  Any company that has a NASDAQ symbol is listed even if they are not public yet.  Slam Content is notable enough, but WrestleSlam Magazine can be deleted or redirected to the Slam Content article.  Article meets WP:COMPANY standards.


 * Delete completely lacks independent references. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.