Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrexham & Shropshire Route


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete, owing to not a single comment asking to keep along with not enough meaningful content to merge. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Wrexham &amp; Shropshire Route

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This route is nothing in its own right, it is the route that Wrexham and Shropshire operate services on and nothing more. As such if this content is to be included then it should be in the article of the TOC not in its own article. Adambro (talk) 11:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge - all info can be included and the RDT can easily be incorporated as its own template just to the Wrexham & Shropshire article although why do we need two? Simply south (talk) 12:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: needless duplication of content. As this company has just one route, any information about it can be described quite adequately in the Wrexham & Shropshire article.  No need for a redirect as this is an unlikely search term.  --RFBailey (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - unsourced speculation/OR about the route a train company takes. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 19:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge As stated above, all the content can be combined with the Wrexham and Shropshire article. Olana North (talk) 07:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as above, though most of this is already included on the company page, so it almost verges on a delete.--Fuelboy (talk) 08:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge though there is not much to transfer in the merger. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The Wrexham and Shropshire article already has a route map which, IMO, is detailed enough hence there's nothing to merge into it. The presence of a route map in that article also makes this one redundant, hence delete. Dpmuk (talk) 17:01, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.