Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wright violin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Wright violin
Not notable amateur violin manufacturer, some of whom's violins, "weren't very good." Not verifiable. :) Dlohcierekim 15:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable due to lack of sources. --Metropolitan90 17:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless good, verifiable sources are provided. I couldn't find relevant hits doing the obvious searches in Google Web or Google Books. Interesting short article but not acceptable without published sources. I have to wonder whether perchance all four of these violins are in Celloboi93's collection. The text reads as a good faith effort to publish information about an otherwise-poorly-known luthier, not like an attempt to promote items for sale or to increase the value of a private collection, but, alas, seems to be original research. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.