Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrinkle-prone skin type


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete as a G12 violation. — Cactus Writer (talk) 17:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Wrinkle-prone skin type

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The cautious approach: I think this is copyvio or close paraphrasing of Textbook of Aging Skin. If so, it should be eliminated... Night of the Big Wind talk  14:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Firm Delete. I read what I believe is the part of the book, but it's sort of vague. However, this is clearly copied from something because of the amount of references to footnotes and such that aren't included in the entry. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:21, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * I also want to note that the editor name of the person who started the article (Firstpaigeinc) is also the name of a writing, editing, and consulting firm by the same name. [First Paige Inc http://www.firstpaigeinc.com/FirstPaige/welcome.html] All of their articles revolve around the doctor mentioned on this page (Leslie Baumann), so I think that there might be a conflict of interest going on here. I have no concrete proof, but it feels like there is, especially since she lists "wikipedia entries" under her resume.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * I noted on another page by this editor (FirstpaigeInc) that someone mentioned that it was a copyvio because it was literally copied from a source, so I doubt that this entry is any different. I'm changing my vote to delete, if possible a speedy delete.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.