Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Writism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW JForget  00:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Writism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a neologism, lacks an indication of notability and judging by the justification for the article on the creating editor's talk page also has a conflict of interests. d a n n o 19:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as advertising. &mdash; RHaworth 19:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * DeleteAn interesting essay, which ought to be published somewhere. But not here, not yet. Seems like a promising new art movement. I hope the talented creater of the article will come back when it has caught on and there are several reliable and independent sources with significant coverage of writism, which would satisfy our need for notability and verifiability. The essay distinguishes the authors concept of "writism" from earlier modern art such as conceptual art. but does not appear to identify the inventors of "writism," nor are major exhibitions which gained critical commentary listed, nor books or articles about the movement. Wikipedia is not the place to make your new idea famous, no matter how creative or praiseworthy it seems to you. Edison (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Wikipedia is not the place for first publication. JohnCD (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism, unsourced essay. Hairhorn (talk) 05:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Interesting original research, but original research nonetheless. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree, interesting OR, but ultiamtely, OR.-- SPhilbrick  T  02:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.