Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrnch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Wrnch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Promotional tone. Fails WP:SUSTAINED. References provided are either mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or rely almost exclusively on company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Edwardx (talk) 13:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to section of Paul Kruszewski where the same material is already included. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:38, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge Fails the criteria for notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 12:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete -- an unremarkable startup. I don't see a reasone for a merge / redirect, and the name is unlikely to be a viable search term and the proposed target, Paul Kruszewski, is tagged for notability itself. No need to preserve article history as it's 100% promo, so a delete is the best outcome, IMO. See also Articles for deletion/GripHeavyIndustries where another of the Kruszewski's startups has been deleted. Appears to be part of a promo walled garden, so it's time to raze it to the ground. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.