Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrong Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete, acknowledging the well-mannered socks. Flowerparty ■ 22:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Wrong Music
I don't think I've ever seen quote so many redlinks in a single article before! CReated in support of Complaints Department (tagged for speedy but I userfied it to the creator's user space, User:Jamswede. Article appears to me to be vanispamcruftisement Just zis Guy you know? 13:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete This is an actual record label that actually exists in the actual world, and as such should be documented in this worthwhile and weighty e-tome. You'll be sorry when Wrong takes over BMG -- Ian W. Stock
 * Delete as vanispamcruftisment. --Ter e nce Ong 13:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: vanispamcruftisment --BigglesTheGreat 13:59, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:VSCA. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 19:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's curious that there are some items in it that aren't linked. I wonder if there's ever been an article in which every word (either the word or as part of a phrase) was redlinked? It's tempting to add them. Шизомби 22:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. &mdash;-- That Guy, From That Show!  (talk) 2006-03-08 03:07Z 
 * Do Not Delete have cleared up the links -- Hooray23
 * Do Not Delete have cleared up the links -- menik 81
 * Do Not Delete Why on earth would you delete a whole article because it's been linked badly? I agree the article has been badly written to wikipedia standards, but a heap of facts and information has been delivered. It should be improved by someone more experienced in wikipedia editing, not deleted. Isn't that what wikipedia is about?-- abscond
 * Do Not Delete Article isn't violating any of Wikipedias rules, DJ The Blade will cry if you delete this article.


 * Neutral This record label might be notable considering Shitmat's involvement but this looks like copyvio from to me.  As it stands delete unless it sees much improvement. kotepho 14:42, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete reasons to keep - find criteria for performers outside of mass media traditions, wrong music fits all of these and is vital to art and music cultures/subcultures everywhere. keep it wrong - xze!
 * Do Not Delete by order of her royal highness, this is history in the making - the queen

why delete its only information about somethig. joey
 * Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 01:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.