Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wtphelan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Fram (talk) 07:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Wtphelan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article on a local insurance agency firm in Massachusetts and Maine. It was flagged with a Prod on the rationale "No evidence that this firm is meets the notability guidelines." The Prod was removed by the article creator without comment; the concern remains so I'm bringing it to AfD on the same rationale as the Prod. AllyD (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Surprisingly for a company that is more than 100 years old, I could find no significant coverage about it at Google News Archive. There are lots of hits but they are trivial - so-and-so worked for the company, or the company opened a new office. Maybe this insurance brokerage is just too small or too local to attract the required media attention. --MelanieN (talk) 23:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)



Please do not delete, the page is being updated with cited information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve.CohenWiki (talk • contribs) 22:00, 7 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Do not Delete This article was again updated with cited local media sources and quality content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve.CohenWiki (talk • contribs) 13:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete  Not many reliable sources and 40 employees says it all   TheStrike  Σagle   03:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.