Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wu Lin Feng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Also see WP:NEXIST and WP:RSUE. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 02:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Wu Lin Feng

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Chinese television martial arts competition. Fails to meet GNG with no significant independent coverage listed. Being listed on the Chinese WP doesn't necessarily make it notable for the English one.Mdtemp (talk) 18:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - This is probably the most popular and longest running martial arts TV program in China, comparable to WWE in the US. Googling its Chinese title gets you more than 1 million results, with significant coverage from every Chinese news site (more than 10,000 news items on Google news). Notable beyond doubt. -Zanhe (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - While being listed on the Chinese WP doesn't necessarily make it notable for the English one, having a well-sourced article on the Chinese WP does.--Antigng (talk) 14:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually no - notability has nothing to do with its presence on Chinese WP  The notability comes from the references which can be transferred over.  Right now all I see is two results listings hardly indicating notability.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added some authoritative Chinese sources to the article. I hope it'll settle any lingering doubt about the show's notability. -Zanhe (talk) 00:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.