Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wu Tang Minority Squad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 19:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Wu Tang Minority Squad
STRONG Delete. Normally, I wouldn't even consider AfDing something like this, but according to the Criteria for Speedy Deletion, contested vanity pages are not eligable for speedying. Not to mention that this fellow is likely going to repeatedly remove the tag no matter what I do. The reasons for deletion should be obvious: it's a little club with three people in it and not a trace notability. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 18:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Not speedy deletion? Oh well, I guess the slow afd deletion should work. Consumed Crustacean, do remember to revert the author if they try to remove the afd tag. J.J.Sagnella 18:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You know, considering how stupid this is, I've remarked it for Speedy. Really, there's no reasonable controversy here. I go from overly happy on the speedy tags to not being liberal enough with them. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 18:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete per nominator --Jim Henry 18:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete unsourced/fake not notable.-- A n d e h 18:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.