Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wu Tien-chang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Wu Tien-chang

 * – ( View AfD View log )

SOAP, autobiography AINH (talk) 19:52, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep represented Taiwan at the Venice Biennale. That's like winning at the Olympic Games, but for artists. Vexations (talk) 21:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Let me clarify, the reason of nomination was not notability but soap. Especially in the "works" part, which is full of comments-AINH (talk) 23:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Concerns about the tone of an article's content can be addressed through normal editing. AllyD (talk) 08:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: While the main substance of this article was contributed by a WP:SPA who may or may not be connected with the subject, and it probably still contains excessive details on some works (which can be reduced further by editing), I think there is enough in the available discussions on the subject's early paintings (for example in the Inside Out: New Chinese Art book that I have referenced) and in the subject's selection for Taiwan at the 2015 Venice Biennale to demonstrate that WP:NARTIST criterion 4 is met. AllyD (talk) 08:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources cited in the article, including this and this establish notability. NemesisAT (talk) 13:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.