Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wugging


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete &mdash; madman bum and angel 20:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Wugging

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This term appears to be a neologism with little to no notability. It fails WP:N and WP:NOT (dictionary), and it may also fail WP:NFT. &mdash; KieferSkunk (talk) &mdash; 21:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The topic seems legit to me, but I'm not sold on the notability. Probably in a few years this will become notable, and an article can be recreated at that time. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 23:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I've found reliable sources: (which I added to the article) and  but I don't believe it is notable enough. Two results,  make me wonder if it's a word invented by Everyclick.com, which is the site mentioned in the articles. However the idea is not new (e.g. , and the existing GoodSearch article) and I'm not sure whether it has another name. Snigbrook 01:18, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.