Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wuhan Foreign Languages School Newspaper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Philg88 ♦talk 09:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Wuhan Foreign Languages School Newspaper

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't think this paper is notable enough. The Chinese version of this entry has been deleted after discussion. The only third-party source in the article is a trivial mention on the subject, but not significant coverage. Huang Jinghai (talk) 03:30, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Run-of-the-mill high school newspaper with no in-depth coverage. The corresponding article on Chinese wiki must have been deleted twice or more, since G5 is the Chinese wiki equivalent of WP:G4. --180.172.239.231 (talk) 12:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete then Redirect to Wuhan Foreign Languages School. Per WP:BEFORE we should look for alternatives to deletion and this would be a useful redirect. The Whispering Wind (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I think even the section "Editorial Office of School’s Newspaper (EOSN)" in Wuhan Foreign Languages School is redundant. A large amount of text in that article is supported only by unreliable sources such as Baidu Baike, Weibo and Facebook. Shih Hsiaoya is only a student not reported by any social media. Xinhuanet mentioned the paper, but the report was taken from a local media, and only talked about a temporary event. And I strongly suspect the article Wuhan Foreign Languages School Newspaper was writen for propaganda purpose, since the creator is obviously a Single-purpose account.--Huang Jinghai (talk) 05:04, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * In view of the analysis above I have amended my action. However, after deletion there is presently no reason not to create a redirect. If the target section is flawed then the way forward is to fix it by editing or, if considered appropriate, removing it. The Whispering Wind (talk) 01:57, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I think, the whole section "Student organization" of that article should be removed. It's clearly writen in propaganda style. So I left a massage on the talk page. Your comments are welcome.--Huang Jinghai (talk) 13:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Philg88 ♦talk 06:10, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - This topic does not appear to meet any WP:GNG guidelines.--Rpclod (talk) 13:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: No evidence or claim that this student/alumni publication is notable. AllyD (talk) 14:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.