Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wuinness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   closed after speedy deletion as hoax. Bduke (talk) 01:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Wuinness

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

From the content and the lack of sources I suspect the article is a hoax but even if it isn't the reliable sources on which a verifiable article could be based do not seem to exist. Guest9999 (talk) 00:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * G3 Seems blatant enough to me to be tagged as a hoax. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The recently added reference to a review in Speculum back in 1956 is not available to the average reader as it requires an account with JSTOR. Unfortunately for User:Brandnewcolony, I have access and, of course, the review contains nothing that refers to this complete load of bollocks. I am going to speedy delete it and close this discussion. --Bduke (talk) 01:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.