Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wulfram

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT. jni 17:32, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Wulfram
Non-notable. Article composed entirely of drivel. No potential to become encyclopedic. Probable copyvio as the article says it comes from the game's forums (no luck with Google however). &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 16:04, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, ad. Wyss 18:27, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Tungsten? I know it's misspelled.  RickK 23:54, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Concur on redirect. Alba 02:47, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Tungsten. Megan1967 05:36, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, in agreement with Trilobite and Wyss (drivel, no potential to become encyclopedic, advertisement). Tygar 03:17, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)