Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wunder (creative agency)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 03:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Wunder (creative agency)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Excessive references most of which don't even mention this company. The agency has worked with some notable companies but notability is not inherent. Jikaoli Kol (talk) 19:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Apologies for possibly over-referencing some of the work, I did not consider how that might be seen as an issue. I’ve further trimmed the list of references while still keeping the article well referenced by a combination of industry magazines, news publications, and international awards.


 * In terms of notability, I live in the region and this agency is well known in Atlantic Canada for the campaigns they’ve produced. As such, they are most certainly of interest to Nova Scotians, Canadians, and other Wikipedia users with an interest in business and marketing agencies.


 * I believe that having their work covered in the media (even if it only briefly mentions the agency) says more about an agency than having a self-written press release published. I realize notability is a subjective standard, but this agency far exceeds the standard established by many similar advertising agency pages: AdGear, Due_North_Communications, Groupaction, Kaboose, Lowe_Roche, McMillan_(agency), Razor_Creative, Round_Table_Advertising. JMacD77 (talk) 00:48, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:OSE and WP:COI. Jikaoli Kol (talk) 05:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:51, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability is not inherited. In order for a topic to meet the criteria for notability, there must be multiple sources that discuss the company specifically, and this must also be significant coverage containing in-depth information on the company and containing independent content. None exist. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 15:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and WP:ORGCRITE.  scope_creep Talk  12:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - run of the mill company that represents other companies. Bearian (talk) 23:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC) P.S. FWIW, WP:SIGCOV is not a subjective standard. Bearian (talk) 23:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.