Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Www.keraleeyamonline.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Whether A7 applies is debated, but the consensus to delete this is very clear. ~ mazca  t/c 21:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Www.keraleeyamonline.com

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No-indication of notability. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete : New website that fails notablity criteria for websites. --  Tinu  Cherian  - 11:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —--  Tinu  Cherian  - 13:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  —--  Tinu  Cherian  - 13:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:36, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete In addition to not being notable, there's no assertion of notability, this should be A-7ed. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 14:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per SpacemanSpiff. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete could be an A7 easily and deleted it as such, but hte PROD has been contested so I'll let AfD run. Relisting because I think it fell off the log when I closed it. StarM 00:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, StarM 00:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Someone delete this already.— S Marshall  Talk / Cont  19:48, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not appear to be a notable website.-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  22:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Even the About us of the website does not contain any claim that would make it notable. Abecedare (talk) 02:13, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete should have been A7 in first place. VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 05:44, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment @ VasuVR, Tinucherian tagged it for CSD, and I PRODded it, but both were declined. So I brought it here to AfD. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:43, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails notability for websites. Hekerui (talk) 09:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.