Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wycombe house cricket club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 00:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Wycombe house cricket club

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable cricket club; non-encyclopedic Johnlp (talk) 00:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete per nom. Andrew nixon (talk) 11:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The article is advertising with at least 3 paragraphs of provable copyvio. However the club gets WP:RS coverage and has apparently produced multiple WP:ATHLETE players now in Wikipedia. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment -- This is a poorly written article about a minor league cricket club, and needs wikifying. Until it is (and links are made), it is difficult to judge its quality.  I am not even clear from it where its ground is located.  This is important, as it is often the best solution for clubs of mere local importance to be merged into the place where they are located.  In this case the articel would need to be pruned to make that feasible.  It also needs to have the "we" and "our" removed.  The copy-vio issue may be resolvable, if the author is in fact connected with the club: the club would need to release the text from its copyright.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 00:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete very little third party coverage.
 * Delete per WP:ORG. Purely local interest, nothing notable (some kids who went on to become professionals isn't enough, in my opinion). Stephen Turner (Talk) 23:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.