Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wyngard Tracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Poorly formed and invalid discussion for deletion. The sources are good enough to assert notability. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Wyngard Tracy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

He is not notable during this days his article must delete.


 * Delete. It has poor biography!. --Gabriel mark (talk) 07:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I have fixed the malformed AfD nomination and decline to participate further in the discussion. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Poor biography? The biography section of that article is very much filled with citations. And citations mean that it's true and thus not poor. This nomination is clearly of bad faith, and an act of deletionism to a very notable article, by some noob whose edits are purely very unconstructive and can be considerd as vandalism. I suggest to you people to now close this nomination as I predict that this clearly has no chance of being supported for deletion. I predict that almost all, if not all, following comments will be keep. --   Felipe   Aira  08:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Altough the first ref doesn't seem to work, he seems notable enough, and the article qualifies as a valid stub. --Twinzor (talk) 08:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Felipe Aira & Twinzor. -iaNLOPEZ1115 09:48, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep An act of bad faith nomination. Also, AfD is not based on whether the article is poorly constructed/written. Per above. Tracy is one among the respected TV personalities in the Philipipines. --Efe (talk) 09:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Felipe Aira and everyone else. Nominator himself is very notorious for making unnecessary articles and edits. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 11:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep There are independent reliable cites in the article that fulfill verifiability and notability.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 12:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This is one of those times where I love to say that this AfD is truly a poor example of why articles are subject to this process in the process. Wyngard Tracy is notable as a celebrity in the Philippines, even if many young people like myself do not know him that well other than being a judge on Pinoy Idol.  Likewise, when someone becomes notable, that notability usually sticks, something proven in the article from my point of view. --Sky Harbor (talk) 13:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Time to bring out the skis... -- Howard  the   Duck  13:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.