Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Treme Wrestling Federation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

X-Treme Wrestling Federation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is not a promotion but an Efed. Nenog 05:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete General consensus is that individual e-feds are not notable. This one does nothing to show why it should be an acception and why it is notable. Lrrr IV 06:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete individual e-feds aren't notable, the concept of e-feds is and is covered but not individual efeds so delete it. MPJ-DK 08:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 08:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - E-feds are in no way shape or form notable. Hellswasteland 14:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Non-notable e-fed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unopeneddoor (talk • contribs)
 * Where does it meet WP:CSD? Morgan Wick 21:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * "X-Treme Wrestling Federation - commonly known as XWF - is an E-fed"; I stopped reading there. E-feds aren't notable under any circumstances, delete. --MarcK 07:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable e-fed. -- Oakster 20:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per everyone else: non-notable e-fed. Nikki311 04:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.