Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-men 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deleted by Sasquatch as "made up BS". Zetawoof(&zeta;) 09:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

X-men 4
IMDb search reveals no evidence of any such film; only a few blogs found via Google support this claim. The spin-off movie Wolverine is apparently on the cards, perhaps this is what the article's creator meant, but other than that this is crystalballism. SM247 03:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BOLLOCKS. --Bill (who is cool!) 03:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC0
 * Delete per nom. ---Charles 03:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not true + bad writing. Nscheffey 03:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. DarthVad e r 05:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable, poorly written, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Ter e nce Ong 06:30, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, rumour, no verifiability. - Motor (talk) 09:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else. Even on the off-chance this is not a joke or a hoax, it can be recreated when there's actually some information on this film. J I P  | Talk 10:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Markeer 15:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball.-- A n d e h 14:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Ckessler 00:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom WCX 00:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Cyrstal ball is too shiny. Kevin_b_er 05:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - silliness. --Wzhao553 06:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.