Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X0xb0x


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

X0xb0x
''' No vote yet. ''' Bringing here to get some consensus. Prodded because "per the external link, only about 200 kits have been sold of this non-notable program". Never formally deprodded, but anon objected on the talk page as follows: "Objection. This is a useful link to a musician like me. Sounds like a jealous competitor objecting, the company has a long waiting list. This link should not be deleted, it is a very useful addition to the Wiki. Quality should always win over quantity, and the x0xb0x is a notable evolution in the history of a pivotal electronic instrument." Definitely a disputed deletion, so an AfD is appropriate. - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I am not so sure about the notability since it returns a lot of result in google, though the article definitely needs expanding. --WinHunter (talk) 16:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - oups, entered the wrong search term into google, this google search returns just 30 results, fails WP:WEB --WinHunter (talk) 16:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is devoid of content.  Expand it and we have a kettle of fish of a very different colour. The anon on the talk page didn't feel strongly enough to expand the article, and s/he seems to know enough to do so.  "not notable". Fiddle Faddle 20:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with Fiddle Faddle as above -- MrDolomite 21:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as well - CrazyRussian talk/email 07:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.