Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X86 vitualization

X86 vitualization was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete the article.

Delete: I added the page a few days ago, and unfortunately made a typo in the page name, although the link to it from X86 was to the correct page name (which didn't exist). I've moved the content to the correct page name. --Brouhaha 17:20, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC) Per author's request, the article has been speedy deleted Geogre 14:07, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * make it into a redirect, and put it on Redirects for deletion. --Ianb 17:44, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Why bother with all that? Put    on the article so that it can be speedied.  --Ardonik.talk 18:00, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Well, I tried putting it up for speedy, but an admin redirected it. As nothing linked to the page and nobody would type that title into the search box, I fail to understand why a speedy delete was not considered appropriate, but that's neither here nor there.  --Ardonik.talk 22:47, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * I didn't put the request in for speedy because it didn't seem to fall into any of the stated criteria in the speedy policy. Perhaps name typos should be added to thte criteria.  --Brouhaha 08:58, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I have no idea why you want to delete the article. X86 virtualization is very real.  Keep  --G3pro 01:03, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Typo in the name, that's why. Mikkalai 04:05, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Damn, I didn't see that originally. :-) Delete --G3pro 04:14, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.