Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XBIZ Award for Best Actress—All-Girl Release


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus appears to be that notability is not established. There is no consensus for a redirect so deletion wins out. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

XBIZ Award for Best Actress—All-Girl Release

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recently contrived niche award without significant reliable independent coverage. Little more than negligible generic text coupled with oversize performer images. Wikipedia is not an image gallery. Similar award pages have been/are being deleted without much controversy. PROD removed without explanation or article improvement. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 23:20, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * And you never notified me about the prod because...?  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 21:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * As is too often the case in these discussions, Erpert, you are not telling the truth. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 23:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * That's for Parody Release; this is All-Girl Release.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 01:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Either you've never read the post I cite, or you have exceptional literacy problems. "Also prodded: XBIZ Award for Best Actress—All-Girl Release, XBIZ Award for Best Actress—Couples-Themed Release". is about as clear as it can be. Your failure to read what is posted to your talk page doesn't justify your making false claims about me or any other editor you disagree with. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 03:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * "Exceptional literacy problems", ? Where in the world did you get the idea that that would be a proper thing to say? You'd better retract that or you're getting reported.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 12:49, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per prior outcomes; Wikipedia is not a directory of nominees for insignificant awards. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Worst-case scenario, this article could be redirected to XBIZ Award. Why would it have to be deleted outright?  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 21:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Because general practice, across all awards, has been simply to render the phrase as "XBIZ Award for Best Actress—All-Girl Release". There's no reason to single out insignificant porn awards for special treatment. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable award, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.