Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XECFCx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

XECFCx

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable band, doesn't meet the general notability criteria or the criteria for musicians and ensembles. Attempt to prod was removed by an anonymous IP without giving a reason. JD554 (talk) 07:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —JD554 (talk) 07:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete : as nom - also no attempt at explaining significance, No Gnews hits, fails WP:V as it is not sourced. Codf1977 (talk) 12:23, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - everything that has been said about this band appears to be on self-built networking and downloading sites. The basic paragraph about their history has been copied and pasted wholesale all over the place, such as here. And if this band is still together I suggest they change their name to something pronounceable by non-robots. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 18:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 23:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.